Hampshire Individual Championship 2002

Contents


Round Three

You often find that games where players are of the same standard are either long hard games, or short draws. The board one clash between Bill Purkiss and Jeremy Fraser-Mitchell was neither of these, with Bill winning in 15 moves. 

It seems that Jeremy played a dubious move in the opening (7.Qb3) and after Bill's reply Nxd4, decided to really mix it up with 8.Bxf7, rather than move his Queen back to d1, where he obviously stood worse. After this Jeremy then sacrificed his Queen for two Knights, for which he was never going to get enough compensation, and resigned soon afterwards. This meant that the board one game was the first to finish and Bill was on maximum points.

The full game was 

Fraser-Mitchell - Purkiss,W [D32]

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.e4 dxe4 6.Bc4 Nc6 7.Qb3 Nxd4 8.Bxf7+ Ke7 9.Bxg8 Nxb3 10.Bxb3 Ke8 11.Nxe4 Qe7 12.f3 Bf5 13.Bg5 Qe5 14.Ne2 Bxe4 15.Bf4 Qxb2 0–1

After 8.. Ke7 if White does not sacrifice his Queen, he has to move her to c4 when the Knight comes into c2, with check. If the Queen is moved off the diagonal the Bishop on f7 will drop off. 

Joining Bill on 3/3 was John Wheeler, who beat Martin Newbury. These were the only two players on maximum points and in fact were 1 point ahead of their nearest rivals, as none of the players on 1.5/2 won their games. 

Jeremy Fraser-Mitchell - Bill Purkiss Round 3

Position after 7..Nxd4 in Fraser-Mitchell v Purkiss

Michael Yeo and David Cordner had a very interesting ending arising, where Michael was left with two Knights and David had a pawn. In certain circumstances this is a win for the player with the Knights, as he can avoid the stalemate, due to the pawn having to move. Not this time though, as the pawn was too far advanced. 

If you are interested in seeing a position where this was achieved, I found the following game where GM M.Gurevich mates GM Ian Rogers. I would hate to get this with a lot of time, let along having no time at all, which is the situation Michael Yeo was in. Mind you, at least you know you can't lose from this position.

On the lower boards it seemed that Dominic Tunks chance of retaining his title was over, as he drew with Les Allen, certainly a good result for Les though. 

Fraser McLeod played the same opening as White against Sherif Gonem, as I had faced from Jeremy Fraser-Mitchell in round one. Sherif succumbed even quicker than me, as he was overwhelmed on the Kingside. In the position in the diagram Fraser played 18.Bxf6 and Sherif replied by taking the Knight on c3, which allowed Fraser to play 19.Qh4 and achieve a mating attack.

In fact, if Sherif had played 18...Bh6, rather than taking the Knight straight away the forced variation 19.Bg5 Bxg5 20.Qxg5 bxc3 would have left him in a worse position but by no means losing.

I had a narrow escape, from a much worse position against Peter Byre where his two Bishops dominated the board. He then won the exchange, but at least this was for one of his Bishops.  I managed to win in the quickplay finish, when Peter dropped the exchange back, leaving me with a won ending  - a very lucky escape.

Fraser McLeod v Sherif Gonem Round 3

Position after 18 Bxf6 in McLeod v Gonem

Round Three Results

White

Grade

Res

Black

Grade

Res

J.Fraser-Mitchell

170

0

W.Purkiss

179

1

M.L.Newbury

165

0

J.F.Wheeler

170

1

D.Cordner

168

½

M.Yeo

202

½

K.Esmat

169

½

T.Anderson

161

½

D.Pye

185

½

I.Cary

151

½

A,Masters

u

1

I.Matthew

136

0

S.Nelson

u

½

A.Mills

147

½

L.C.Allen

143

½

D.R.Tunks

187

½

F.McLeod

159

1

S.Gonem

143

0

P.Byre

129

0

G.Stuart

144

1

R.Hunt

126

½

R.Perrin

138

½

J.Coburn

146

0

J.Shaddick

129

1


Top